Within Northern Territory
Which Northern Territory UFO Cases Still Matter?
Reports from Darwin, Arnhem Land and Palmerston show how local sightings entered newspapers and official channels with uneven outcomes.
On this page
- The Arnhem Land multi witness report
- The Palmerston case reported as solved
- What Darwin's official reporting role reveals
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Darwin, Arnhem Land and Palmerston produced several of the Northern Territory’s more instructive UFO reports, although not necessarily its most extraordinary. Their importance lies in showing three different outcomes: an Arnhem Land observation supported by several witnesses and passed to the Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF); a Palmerston mystery that a contemporary newspaper explicitly reported as solved; and Darwin’s recurring role as the place where distant sightings were received, checked and turned into official paperwork.
None of these cases provides strong public evidence of an extraordinary aircraft. The Arnhem Land file is intriguing but incomplete, while the Palmerston record survives mainly as a newspaper index entry rather than a readily accessible investigation. Together, they demonstrate why the Territory’s UFO history contains so many apparently unresolved stories: sightings could travel hundreds of kilometres through witnesses, police, aviation officials and journalists, yet the surviving record might preserve only a summary, headline or administrative conclusion.
The Arnhem Land multi-witness report
The strongest historical claim in this regional group concerns seven people who reportedly saw what contemporary accounts called a “flying saucer” in Arnhem Land. The report was forwarded to RAAF Command in Darwin, giving it a clearer official connection than a sighting mentioned only in local conversation or later UFO literature. Library and Archives NT’s newspaper index preserves that central fact, though it does not reproduce a complete witness-by-witness account on the public catalogue page.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
Material preserved in declassified Australian Air Force files adds some investigative detail. The RAAF sought information from civil aviation authorities and established that no aircraft had been reported lost in Arnhem Land. The available archival text also shows that officials considered the re-entry of a satellite or rocket component as a possible explanation. That is significant because it indicates that the report was not simply filed under “unknown”: investigators attempted to compare it with aircraft movements and known space activity.[documents.theblackvault.com]documents.theblackvault.comROYAL, AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCEt - -PA_July 28, 2013 — DARWIN… UFO SIGHTTITGS… Frazer) to whom the native reported the sighting…. It was ascertained from DCA t…
The reference to a satellite or rocket-body re-entry helps place the incident in its historical setting. During the early space age, bright re-entries could produce long-lasting fireballs, fragmentation and apparent formations of lights. Observers unfamiliar with such events might reasonably describe a structured or powered object, especially when viewing it against a dark, largely featureless horizon. A luminous body breaking into several pieces could also lead different witnesses to report different shapes or movements.
Even so, the public evidence does not establish that a re-entry was positively matched to the observation. No accessible record supplies a confirmed satellite identity, orbital calculation, precise observation time or complete set of directions from the witnesses. The distinction matters: “possibly a re-entry” is an investigative hypothesis, not a solved identification.
Why seven witnesses do not settle the question
Multiple witnesses generally make a case more interesting because they reduce the chance that the entire report was caused by one person’s eyesight, imagination or mistake. They do not automatically establish the object’s distance, size or physical nature. People standing together often share the same limited viewing conditions and may influence one another’s description after the event.
The Arnhem Land report would be substantially stronger if the surviving file included:
- independent statements taken before the witnesses discussed the event;
- exact times, bearings and elevation angles;
- the duration and apparent path of the object;
- weather and visibility information;
- astronomical and satellite-re-entry calculations;
- records from aircraft crews, air-traffic controllers or radar.
Without those elements, the case remains a credible report that something unusual was seen, but not compelling evidence of an unconventional craft.
There is also a wider archival problem. The publicly searchable catalogue often reveals that a newspaper article or government file existed without making every underlying page readily available online. Library and Archives NT identifies the relevant Northern Territory News material, while declassified RAAF files preserve fragments of the official response, but neither source provides a seamless reconstruction of the observation from first sighting to final assessment.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
A separate Arnhem Land report appeared much later, in January 1995, when two Aboriginal elders were said to have encountered a bright object while driving near Milingimbi. A later retrospective identifies the men as Joe Djembangu and Eddy Gaburr and says they described an object with a powerful light while travelling after dark. This account adds to Arnhem Land’s regional sighting history, but it appears to rest principally on newspaper reporting rather than measurements, photographs or an accessible official investigation.[UFO Research Queensland - Australia]uforq.orgUFO Research QueenslandUFO Research Queensland
The two Arnhem Land stories should therefore not be merged into one continuing incident. The seven-witness report entered RAAF channels during the earlier official-investigation era; the Milingimbi story was a separate 1990s media account. Their shared geography may make them look like a local pattern, but the surviving evidence does not demonstrate a common cause.
The Palmerston case reported as solved
Palmerston offers a useful contrast because the surviving record does not merely describe a mystery. Library and Archives NT indexes a Northern Territory News article published on 3 December 1988 under the emphatic title “Solved! The UFO mystery”. Its subjects include unidentified flying objects in Palmerston, an illustration and a person named Don Craggs.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
That catalogue entry establishes that a specific Palmerston report attracted enough attention to receive illustrated newspaper coverage and that the paper subsequently presented an explanation. What the online index does not reveal is the explanation itself. The catalogue does not reproduce the article’s text, identify the object or show what evidence supported the solution.
It would therefore be unsafe to invent a cause from the headline. The object may have been an aircraft, balloon, astronomical body, promotional device, reflection or another ordinary source, but the available public entry does not say. The responsible conclusion is narrower: the case was treated by the contemporary newspaper as resolved, yet the accessible digital record is too abbreviated to evaluate whether that resolution was well demonstrated.
This is more than an archival technicality. Later UFO lists often preserve the exciting first report while losing the follow-up explanation. A headline about a mysterious light may be repeated for decades, whereas a correction or solution printed days later disappears from retellings. Palmerston illustrates the opposite problem: the solution headline survives, but most of the explanatory substance does not.
For readers assessing Northern Territory cases, that makes Palmerston neither an unexplained classic nor a confirmed debunking. It is a reportedly solved case whose evidential trail is incomplete online. A scan of page 4 of the Northern Territory News for 3 December 1988, together with any preceding article about the original sighting, would be needed for a firmer judgement.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
Later reports around Palmerston were generally less well documented. In July 2000, for example, a Darwin newspaper letter described orange or golden lights moving in the direction of Palmerston on a night when fireworks, distress flares and an approaching Boeing 737 were also visible. The account is useful precisely because it records several potential sources of confusion within the same viewing period. It does not establish that every light was explained, but it shows how aircraft, pyrotechnics and distant moving lights can become mixed into a single UFO episode.[rense.com]rense.comOpen source on rense.com.
Photographic claims from the wider Palmerston area have faced similar limitations. Secondary reporting has described residents photographing unexplained lights or objects, but images without dependable information about exposure, focus, distance and direction rarely allow aircraft, insects, birds, lens effects or celestial objects to be excluded. A photograph may show that the camera recorded something; it does not by itself prove that the object was large, distant or technologically unusual.[ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com]ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.comUnidentified Anomalous PhenomenaUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena
What Darwin’s official reporting role reveals
Darwin matters less as the location of one decisive UFO encounter than as the Top End’s reporting hub. Its RAAF command, civil aviation links, police, newspapers and communications services were the practical channels through which reports from remote communities could reach federal authorities. The Arnhem Land case is a clear example: the observation occurred far from Darwin, but Darwin was where it entered the military system.
This reflected the RAAF’s national role at the time. By the 1970s, the Air Force was formally receiving and assessing UFO reports and supplied standard questionnaires asking witnesses about time, direction, appearance, weather and movement. The purpose was primarily air defence and aviation identification, not an attempt to prove or disprove extraterrestrial visitation.[NAA]naa.gov.auufo sightings weapons testing site woomeraufo sightings weapons testing site woomera
Declassified planning documents indicate that RAAF Base Darwin was considered suitable for handling UFO investigations over a much broader region, including responsibility associated with Western Australia. That administrative proposal shows how the Air Force organised reports geographically: a base could act as an investigative node even when the sighting occurred hundreds or thousands of kilometres away.[Wikimedia Commons]upload.wikimedia.orgInvestigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554 1 30, part 2Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554 1 30, part 2
This arrangement had advantages. Darwin-based officers could consult civil aviation authorities, check whether an aircraft was missing or operating in the area, request statements and forward material to higher command. In a sparsely populated territory, however, those checks were often conducted after delays and across considerable distances. By the time investigators contacted a remote witness, short-lived evidence such as weather conditions, transient lights or exact recollections could already have changed.
The system also explains why official documentation should not be confused with official endorsement. A RAAF file proves that a report was received or examined; it does not prove that officers considered an exotic explanation likely. National Archives material shows that most Australian cases were approached as identification problems involving aircraft, astronomical objects, balloons, meteors, satellites and atmospheric effects. The Archives retain the records because they document government activity, not because every reported object remained inexplicable.[NAA]naa.gov.auNAAFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.auNAAFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.au
Darwin newspapers formed the other major filter. Library and Archives NT indexes articles such as “UFO answers” from 1983 and “Visits by aliens: fact or fiction?” from 1994, demonstrating continuing local interest well beyond the earliest flying-saucer era. Yet catalogue records usually supply only the title, publication date, subject and page number. They establish the history of media attention but cannot always substantiate the detailed claims later attributed to those articles.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
This difference between an index and a full case file is crucial. A newspaper title may be evidence that a debate occurred, but it is not equivalent to the article’s evidence. Likewise, an Air Force memorandum may record a proposed explanation without proving that the necessary calculations were completed. Darwin’s surviving records are therefore strongest when used to trace how reports moved through institutions, and weaker when used to make confident claims about what witnesses actually encountered.
Which Northern Territory cases still matter?
The Arnhem Land report matters most because it combines several witnesses with a documented RAAF response. Officials checked at least one conventional possibility—whether an aircraft was missing—and considered space debris or satellite re-entry. The absence of complete timings and technical comparison prevents a firm conclusion, leaving it unresolved in the limited public record rather than positively unexplained.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
The Palmerston case matters for a different reason. It demonstrates that at least some local UFO stories received ordinary explanations quickly enough for a newspaper to declare the mystery solved. Because the publicly accessible index omits the solution, the case also warns against treating digitised catalogue entries as complete evidence.[Territory Stories]territorystories.nt.gov.auOpen source on nt.gov.au.
Darwin’s significance is institutional. It was where remote testimony met military and aviation bureaucracy, and where incomplete sightings could become lasting archival records. That process preserved valuable traces of Northern Territory UFO history, but it also created an appearance of official mystery around reports that may have remained open simply because the information was insufficient.
Taken together, the three regional examples support a measured ranking:
- Arnhem Land seven-witness report: genuinely interesting and officially handled, but too incomplete for an extraordinary conclusion.
- Palmerston 1988 case: reportedly solved at the time, though the accessible record does not preserve enough detail to judge the explanation.
- Later Darwin–Palmerston lights and photographs: useful evidence of recurring public interest, but generally weakened by competing light sources, limited measurements and reliance on newspaper or secondary accounts.
The cases still matter because they reveal the difference between “unidentified” and “unexplainable”. In the Northern Territory record, an unidentified object often means that investigators lacked a precise time, direction, comparison image or recoverable physical trace. The Arnhem Land, Palmerston and Darwin files preserve real reports and real official interest, but they do not provide persuasive public evidence that the Top End was visited by extraordinary craft.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Which Northern Territory UFO Cases Still Matter?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
In Plain Sight
An award-winning journalist investigates a story largely ignored by mainstream media but right there, in front of our eyes ... UFOs, UAPs...
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Book Excerpt: ing can never be positively identified. It might have been a hallucination or it might have been some vehicle from outer sp...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: documents.theblackvault.com
Title: ROYAL, AUSTRALIAN AIR FORCE
Link:https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/australia/E1327_5-4-AIR_part%201_7061046.pdf
Source snippet
t - -PA_July 28, 2013 — DARWIN... UFO SIGHTTITGS... Frazer) to whom the native reported the sighting.... It was ascertained from DCA t...
Published: July 28, 2013
2.
Source: uforq.org
Title: UFO Research Queensland
Link:https://uforq.org/looking-back-at-[wycliffe-well
3.
Source: rense.com
Link:https://rense.com/general2/ozsky.htm
4.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2012/
5.
Source: upload.wikimedia.org
Title: Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554 1 30, part 2
Link:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/Investigations_of_flying_saucers_in_Australia%2C_A703%2C_554-1-30%2C_part_2.pdf
6.
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: NAAFlying saucers – fact or fiction? | naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/blog/flying-saucers-fact-or-fiction
7.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/textual-and-microfilm
8.
Source: lists.wikimedia.org
Link:https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/daily-article-l%40lists.wikimedia.org/latest?count=200&page=16
9.
Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/07/
10.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/198775/0
11.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/199251/0
Source snippet
Territory StoriesVisits by aliens: fact or fiction?Seven people have reported sighting a flying saucer in Arnhem Land to the R.A.A.F. Com...
12.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/190873/0
13.
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: ufo sightings weapons testing site woomera
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/students-and-teachers/student-research-portal/learning-resource-themes/war/defence-equipment-and-weapons/ufo-sightings-weapons-testing-site-woomera
14.
Source: defence.gov.au
Title: RAA F Base Darwin | About | Defence
Link:https://www.defence.gov.au/about/locations-property/pfas/pfas-management-sites/raaf-base-darwin
15.
Source: worksafe.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au A.M. Cranes & Rigging Pty Ltd | NT Work Safe
Link:https://worksafe.nt.gov.au/laws-and-compliance/enforceable-undertakings/a.m.-cranes-and-rigging-pty-ltd
16.
Source: pfes.nt.gov.au
Link:https://pfes.nt.gov.au/newsroom/2023/charges-aggravated-assault-palmerston-0
17.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/532079/0/2
18.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/82487/0
19.
Source: nntt.gov.au
Title: Native Title Determination Details
Link:https://www.nntt.gov.au/searchRegApps/NativeTitleClaims/Pages/Determination_details.aspx?NNTT_Fileno=DCD2006%2F001
20.
Source: localcourt.nt.gov.au
Link:https://localcourt.nt.gov.au/sites/default/files/decisions/20060206ntmc010.html
21.
Source: aiatsis.gov.au
Link:https://aiatsis.gov.au/publication/35624
22.
Source: localcourt.nt.gov.au
Link:https://localcourt.nt.gov.au/sites/default/files/decisions/ntmc056.html
23.
Source: localcourt.nt.gov.au
Link:https://localcourt.nt.gov.au/sites/default/files/decisions/ntmc018.html
24.
Source: parliament.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.aunested_content – Northern Territory Government – Legislative Assembly
Link:https://parliament.nt.gov.au/business/hansard/transcripts/listing/nest_content?parent_id=358668&target_id=342602
25.
Source: parliament.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.aunested_content – Northern Territory Government – Legislative Assembly
Link:https://parliament.nt.gov.au/business/hansard/questions/questions_listing/nest_content?parent_id=364399&target_id=337722
26.
Source: nntt.gov.au
Title: Application Details
Link:https://www.nntt.gov.au/searchRegApps/NativeTitleClaims/Pages/details.aspx?NTDA_Fileno=DC1996%2F004
27.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/100992/0
28.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/163910/0
29.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/201824/0
30.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/180056/0
31.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/180243/0
32.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/180252/0
33.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/188976/0
34.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/180294/0
35.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/180379/0
36.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/179779/0
37.
Source: lant.nt.gov.au
Title: surveying darwin 1869
Link:https://lant.nt.gov.au/explore-nt-history/surveying-darwin-1869
38.
Source: navigator.nt.gov.au
Link:https://navigator.nt.gov.au/page/keywordsearch.php
39.
Source: nt.gov.au
Link:https://nt.gov.au/leisure/arts-culture-heritage/libraries-and-records/search-the-nt-archives
40.
Source: lant.nt.gov.au
Link:https://lant.nt.gov.au/
41.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/817207/0
42.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/736146/0
43.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/7717/0
44.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/739216/0
45.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/269262/0
46.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/460988/0
47.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/10067/0
48.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/442542/0
49.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/997678/0/21
50.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Henry John Temple, 3rd Viscount Palmerston
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_John_Temple%2C_3rd_Viscount_Palmerston
51.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Unidentified flying object
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unidentified_flying_object
52.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO (band)
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_%28band%29
53.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings
54.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/visit-us/northern-territory
55.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/information-management/records-authorities/agency-specific-records-authorities
56.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/bombing-darwin
57.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/aerial-photographs
58.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/defence-and-war-service-records/boer-war-vietnam
59.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/australias-prime-ministers/gough-whitlam/before-office
60.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/passenger-records-held-sydney
61.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/australias-prime-ministers/john-gorton/before-office
62.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/research-agents
63.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/reverend-john-flynn-and-australian-inland-mission
64.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets/edward-john-connellan-and-connellan-airways
65.
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide chinese australian journeys 0
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-06/research-guide-chinese-australian-journeys_0.pdf
66.
Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide safe haven
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-safe-haven.pdf
67.
Source: naa.gov.au
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-citizenship-in-australia.pdf
68.
Source: awm.gov.au
Link:https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C44777
69.
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Title: UF O reports
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/explore-by-time-period/postwar/ufo-reports/
70.
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/
71.
Source: history.blog.gov.uk
Title: blog.gov.uk Lord Palmerston
Link:https://history.blog.gov.uk/2016/04/07/lord-palmerston/
72.
Source: thecrags.net
Link:https://www.thecrags.net/aliens/
73.
Source: GOV.UK
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/henry-john-temple-3rd-viscount-palmerston
74.
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: ufo report 2008
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a789e38ed915d042206403a/ufo_report_2008.pdf
75.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/ufos
76.
Source: samuseum.sa.gov.au
Link:https://www.samuseum.sa.gov.au/collection/archives/provenances/series/items/aa
77.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/63261/0
78.
Source: territorystories.nt.gov.au
Title: nt.gov.au Territory Stories
Link:https://territorystories.nt.gov.au/10070/28018/0
Additional References
79.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227662738_The_Lust_to_Kill_and_the_Arnhem_Land_Sorcerer_An_Exercise_in_Integrative_Anthropology
80.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/966699752/Beyond-the-Impossible-revised-doc
81.
Source: armynavyairforce.co.uk
Link:https://www.armynavyairforce.co.uk/610_squadron.htm
82.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbCYWd5hwrs/
83.
Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/aussiedestinationsunknown/?hl=en
84.
Source: linkedin.com
Link:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/australias-forgotten-uap-record-now-part-disclosure-dr-andrew-btobc
85.
Source: independent.co.uk
Link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/dr-phil-trump-ufo-files-b3019901.html
86.
Source: sciencedirect.com
Link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006320706002965
87.
Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/stream/AustralianUFOFiles/A703_554-1-30_Part%202_12055824_djvu.txt
88.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/2630935270341657/posts/25823522847322905/