Within Victoria UFOs

Who Preserved Victoria's UFO Case Files?

Victoria's organised UFO groups preserved valuable testimony and publications, though they lacked the powers and technical access of government agencies.

74 sources 3 graphics

On this page

  • The Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society
  • Case collection, witness interviews and publications
  • The strengths and limits of civilian archives
Preview for Who Preserved Victoria's UFO Case Files?

Introduction

Civilian investigators preserved much of Victoria’s UFO history. From the late 1950s, volunteer researchers collected sighting forms, interviewed witnesses, copied newspaper reports, corresponded with the Royal Australian Air Force and published material that might otherwise have disappeared. Their most influential organisation was the Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society, later renamed the Victorian UFO Research Society, or VUFORS.

Civilian Groups illustration 1

These archives matter because official records are often incomplete, narrowly focused or silent about cases such as the 1966 Westall school sighting. Civilian files can retain names, drawings, local press coverage and testimony gathered while memories were relatively fresh. Yet they are not neutral scientific datasets. Investigators lacked compulsory access to witnesses, radar records, aircraft movements and classified material, while publications sometimes mixed careful casework with speculative interpretations. Victoria’s surviving UFO record must therefore be read as a combination of evidence and advocacy: valuable for reconstructing what people reported, but rarely sufficient to establish what they actually saw.

The Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society

Victoria’s best-known civilian organisation began at Melbourne University on 17 February 1957 as the Victorian branch of the Australian Flying Saucer Research Society. It soon became independent under the name Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society, with Melbourne lawyer Peter Norris as an early president. In 1968, reflecting a wider shift away from the culturally loaded phrase “flying saucer”, it became the Victorian UFO Research Society.[Wikipedia]WikipediaAustralian ufologyJanuary 23, 2006 —… Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society (VFSRS). At this time the… Jump up to: 1 2 Magee, Judith, The History…Published: January 23, 2006

The society belonged to a period when no Australian civilian institution routinely collected unusual aerial reports for historical or scientific research. The RAAF accepted reports primarily to determine whether an observation involved an aircraft, missile, satellite, atmospheric event or possible defence concern. Civilian groups approached the subject more broadly and were often willing to spend time on incidents that officials considered too weak, commonplace or inconsequential to pursue.

Several long-serving members shaped the Victorian organisation. Norris acted as a public spokesman and pressed government agencies to take reports seriously. Judith Magee served in senior roles and edited or contributed to the society’s publications. Paul Norman became a prominent investigator and later worked on major cases including the disappearance of Frederick Valentich. Contemporary society material described Magee as favouring a factual, “middle-of-the-road” approach, although some of her published interpretations went beyond what conventional evidence could demonstrate.[UFOs Scientific Research]ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.comcommittee members of vfsrsvufors 1959Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society/ Victorian UFO Research Society…. Some individuals such as Peter Norris; Paul Norman and Judi…

This mixture was characteristic of organised ufology. Members could be methodical about recording times, directions and witness statements while simultaneously believing that at least some unexplained reports represented extraordinary craft. Their case files must be evaluated document by document rather than accepted or dismissed according to the organisation’s overall beliefs.

How civilian case files were built

A typical investigation began when a witness telephoned or wrote to the society, responded to a newspaper appeal or was referred by another researcher. Investigators might send a questionnaire, visit the location, prepare a sketch map and ask the witness to describe the object’s apparent shape, colour, movement, elevation and duration.

The resulting record could include:

  • a completed sighting form or handwritten statement;
  • correspondence between the witness and investigator;
  • drawings of the object or its path;
  • photographs of the location or alleged physical traces;
  • newspaper cuttings and broadcast summaries;
  • notes on weather, stars, planets or known aircraft;
  • letters exchanged with the RAAF, airports or other UFO groups;
  • the investigator’s conclusion, ranging from an identified object to an unresolved report.

These records preserved the language witnesses used before later documentaries and popular retellings standardised the story. That is particularly important in cases where descriptions changed over time. An early account may describe a light, disc or indistinct shape, while a later version adds windows, metallic details, military aircraft or claims of official intimidation. Comparing successive records helps distinguish the original observation from later interpretation.

The society’s principal public outlet was the Australian Flying Saucer Review. Surviving issues show that it circulated reports, correspondence, commentary and discussions of investigations well beyond Victoria. Copies are now scattered among libraries and specialist archives, including digitised magazine collections assembled overseas. The existence of those copies is significant: small volunteer organisations frequently stored records in members’ homes, making their archives vulnerable when officers retired, moved or died.[Internet Archive]archive.orgAustralian Annual Flying Saucer ReviewResearch Society, P.O. Box 43…Read more…

Publication also created a problem. Once a case appeared in a UFO magazine, the printed version could become more influential than the underlying notes. Space constraints encouraged condensed narratives, while editors selected reports they considered interesting. Mundane explanations, unsuccessful enquiries and poorly documented sightings were less likely to receive the same attention as dramatic unresolved cases.

Westall shows both the value and the gaps

The 6 April 1966 Westall sighting is the clearest example of why Victoria’s civilian archives matter. Students and staff at schools in Melbourne’s south-east reported one or more unusual objects over the area, followed by activity near open land known as the Grange. The Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society inspected the location and interviewed witnesses. It also republished an anonymous contemporary account from the Westall High School journal, The Clayton Calendar, in the June 1966 Australian Flying Saucer Review.[blogs.slv.vic.gov.au]blogs.slv.vic.gov.auStrange lights in the sky: The Westall UFO event, 19666 Apr 2024 — This account was republished in its entirety in the June 1966 issue of…Published: June 1966

That republication preserved testimony from the period even though the original school journal is not held by State Library Victoria. It records descriptions and local speculation that might otherwise be known only through later recollections. The journal account also mentioned private aircraft, mainly Cessnas, flying near the reported objects and considered whether aircraft from nearby Moorabbin might be relevant. Such details complicate simplified versions of Westall in which a single clearly defined craft appeared without any ordinary aviation activity nearby.[blogs.slv.vic.gov.au]blogs.slv.vic.gov.auStrange lights in the sky: The Westall UFO event, 19666 Apr 2024 — This account was republished in its entirety in the June 1966 issue of…Published: June 1966

The society’s investigation nevertheless left substantial gaps. No exhaustive contemporary report was published, and the surviving public record does not contain a complete, securely catalogued set of all original interviews. It is consequently difficult to determine precisely how many people were interviewed, what questions they were asked, whether statements were independent and how investigators handled contradictory descriptions.

Judith Magee’s editorial note supported the authenticity of the school account and referred to alleged attempts by authorities to suppress discussion. That note is evidence of what a leading investigator believed, but it is not independent proof of an official cover-up. The distinction is essential. Civilian archives may document allegations of threats, confiscated photographs or silencing, yet those allegations still require corroboration from contemporary records or separately interviewed witnesses.[blogs.slv.vic.gov.au]blogs.slv.vic.gov.auStrange lights in the sky: The Westall UFO event, 19666 Apr 2024 — This account was republished in its entirety in the June 1966 issue of…Published: June 1966

Later Westall researchers benefited from the trail preserved by the society, newspapers and former pupils. At the same time, decades of publicity made memory contamination increasingly likely. Witnesses could encounter other accounts, documentaries and suggested explanations before being interviewed again. The early civilian material is therefore generally more valuable for reconstructing the initial story than interviews recorded many decades later, although even the early files do not resolve the identity of the reported object.

Archive evidence
Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554-1-30, part 1 Untitled
Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554-1-30, part 1Australian government · Wikimedia Commons · 1953-1963 · 128047273This is a primary Australian government file on flying‑saucer investigations (A703 series), directly relevant to the article’s focus on preserved UFO case records and civilian–RAAF correspondence; it provides authentic archival context and strong reader value.Public domain ·View original record

Civilian researchers and official records

The relationship between Victorian investigators and government agencies was neither complete co-operation nor total hostility. Civilian groups wrote to the Department of Air and sought explanations for sightings, while officials sometimes responded with assessments involving astronomical or meteorological causes.

One surviving example concerns correspondence about a reported event that the Department of Air attributed to moonrise combined with weather conditions. A later summary of the file notes that the wording of the internal assessment was made more definite before the explanation was sent to the Victorian society: “could have produced” became “produced”. The alteration does not prove that the explanation was wrong, but it illustrates why researchers should compare internal memoranda with outward correspondence rather than relying solely on the final official letter.[Paranormal New Zealand]hauntedauckland.comParanormal New Zealand UAS files located in the Australian Government recordParanormal New Zealand UAS files located in the Australian Government record

In March 1968, Magee wrote to the Chief of Air Force Intelligence seeking a conference about current RAAF investigations of unidentified flying objects. Such correspondence demonstrates that the society attempted to obtain access and recognition rather than operating entirely outside official channels. It also highlights the limits of its position: the RAAF decided what information to release, and civilian researchers could not inspect defence radar, compel personnel to speak or test classified explanations.[Paranormal New Zealand]hauntedauckland.comParanormal New Zealand UAS files located in the Australian Government recordParanormal New Zealand UAS files located in the Australian Government record

Government files now held by the National Archives of Australia preserve part of this interaction. Relevant holdings include reports generated by RAAF headquarters in Victoria, correspondence with members of the public and civilian organisations, and files containing photographs or information about unusual aerial sightings. A privately compiled index of digitised National Archives material identifies Victorian headquarters files spanning the late 1960s through the 1990s.[Internet Archive]archive.orgOpen source on archive.org.

These official files and civilian collections answer different questions. RAAF documents are strongest on administrative handling, defence procedures and conventional checks. Civilian records are often richer in witness narrative and local follow-up. Neither archive is complete on its own, and agreement between them is more persuasive than a claim appearing in only one.

The Valentich archive problem

The 1978 disappearance of pilot Frederick Valentich over Bass Strait produced a much larger documentary trail than most Victorian UFO reports. The recorded radio exchange, search activity and aviation investigation are official matters; surrounding witness reports, photographs and extraordinary theories were pursued extensively by civilian researchers. The National Archives holds the principal government accident file, while VUFORS and associated investigators accumulated copies, correspondence and additional claims.[NAA]naa.gov.auflying saucers fact or fictionflying saucers fact or fiction

An internal RAAF note from 1989 stated that paperwork concerning the disappearance had been photocopied by the Victorian UFO Research Society in 1983 and suggested that enquiries be directed to the society. This is a striking example of a civilian organisation becoming a secondary repository for a case that continued to attract public attention after the immediate official investigation had ended.[Wikipedia]WikipediaAustralian ufologyJanuary 23, 2006 —… Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society (VFSRS). At this time the… Jump up to: 1 2 Magee, Judith, The History…Published: January 23, 2006

Yet possession of a large file does not make every item equally reliable. Reports received after intense media coverage may include misidentified stars, unrelated lights, rumours or recollections adjusted to fit the known flight path. Photographs require information about exposure, camera movement, processing and chain of custody. Statements must be dated so that contemporary evidence can be separated from claims first recorded years later.

Civilian investigators helped ensure that competing hypotheses remained visible, but they also contributed to the case’s transformation from an aviation disappearance into an alleged UFO mystery. Later sceptical analysis has proposed that Valentich became disorientated and mistook celestial objects or reflections for a craft before crashing. That interpretation remains disputed, but it shows why the archive must support aviation and astronomical analysis rather than merely preserve unusual testimony.[Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer The Valentich Disappearance: Another UFO Cold CaseSkeptical Inquirer The Valentich Disappearance: Another UFO Cold Case

Civilian Groups illustration 2

Publications became archives in their own right

VUFORS publications are more than collections of sighting stories. They document the changing priorities and language of Victorian UFO research. Early issues used the “flying saucer” terminology of the 1950s, while later editions discussed unidentified flying objects, investigation standards and attempts to achieve greater scientific respectability.

The magazines also preserve ephemeral material: addresses for reporting sightings, lists of officers, notices of meetings, appeals for information and exchanges with researchers elsewhere in Australia. Such details allow historians to reconstruct the network through which cases circulated. A Victorian report might be discussed in Melbourne, summarised by a group in another state and eventually included in an international magazine or catalogue.

This circulation could strengthen a case when it brought specialist attention to the evidence. In 1967, American atmospheric physicist James E. McDonald visited Australia and examined several reports with local investigators. Material concerning his trip indicates that Victorian researchers assisted with contacts and field enquiries, including work related to a 1963 sighting near Moe.[kirkmcd.princeton.edu]kirkmcd.princeton.edujem tape achives basterfieldjem tape achives basterfield

Circulation could also magnify mistakes. One uncertain report might be repeated in several newsletters without fresh investigation, creating the appearance of multiple supporting sources. Later writers sometimes cited the published retelling rather than the original witness statement. Researchers must therefore trace claims backwards to their earliest available form and avoid counting copied versions as independent evidence.

Civilian Groups illustration 3

The strengths and limits of civilian archives

Victoria’s civilian UFO collections have three enduring strengths.

They preserve testimony that official systems did not prioritise. School pupils, farmers, motorists and householders could provide detailed accounts even when no defence or aviation concern existed.

They reveal how investigations developed. Draft notes, letters and early magazine reports can show when important details entered a case and whether they were present from the beginning.

They retain local context. Civilian researchers often knew the geography, newspapers, airports and communities involved. That helped them locate witnesses and recover material that a central government office might overlook.

Their weaknesses are equally important.

Reporting was self-selected. The archive contains accounts from people motivated to contact a UFO organisation. It cannot show how many similar observations were quickly identified or never reported.

Methods varied. Some interviewers used careful questionnaires; others asked leading questions or approached witnesses with strong prior beliefs. Surviving summaries do not always reveal the method used.

Technical access was limited. Volunteers could request weather or aircraft information, but they had no guaranteed access to radar data, military operations, maintenance records or restricted airspace activity.

Preservation was uneven. Files kept in private houses could be dispersed, damaged or separated from their original order. A published article may survive while its supporting interview notes do not.

Unresolved did not mean extraordinary. A case could remain unidentified simply because the time, direction or duration was too uncertain to test. Civilian publications sometimes treated the unexplained remainder as especially significant, even though poor data are themselves a common reason that identification fails.

How Victoria’s UFO files should be read today

The most reliable use of Victoria’s civilian archives is historical reconstruction, not automatic proof of exotic craft. A strong case file should contain an early statement, a clear date and location, independent witnesses, consistent descriptions, contemporary checks and preserved original material. Its value rises when civilian records can be compared with newspapers, weather observations, aviation documents and National Archives files.

Readers should be more cautious when a claim appears only in a late interview, when the original notes are missing or when several publications repeat the same source. Assertions of military pursuit, confiscated evidence or official intimidation deserve particular scrutiny because they can become central to a case while remaining difficult to verify.

The Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society and VUFORS did not solve the state’s most famous sightings. Their more important achievement was to prevent much of the testimony from vanishing. Without their magazines, correspondence and interviews, the historical record of Westall, Valentich and many lesser Victorian reports would be substantially thinner. The surviving archive is therefore indispensable but not decisive: a record of what witnesses said, what investigators believed and how Victoria’s UFO stories were preserved, contested and reshaped over time.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Who Preserved Victoria's UFO Case Files?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Australian ufology
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_ufology

Source snippet

January 23, 2006 —... Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society (VFSRS). At this time the... Jump up to: 1 2 Magee, Judith, The History...

Published: January 23, 2006

2. Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/stream/AustralianUFOFiles/A9755_11_3533465_djvu.txt

Source snippet

Internet ArchiveFull text of "Australian UFO Files"... Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society" with Mr. Peter E. Norris L.L.B. as Presi...

3. Source: archive.org
Title: Australian Annual Flying Saucer Review 1981 06
Link:https://archive.org/details/Australian_Annual_Flying_Saucer_Review

Source snippet

Research Society, P.O. Box 43...Read more...

4. Source: archive.org
Title: Australian Flying Saucer Review 1960 09 vol 1 no 3
Link:https://archive.org/details/Australian_Flying_Saucer_Review_1960_09_vol_1_no_3

Source snippet

Internet ArchiveAustralian Flying Saucer Review 1960 09 vol 1 no 315 Oct 2019 — Australian Flying Saucer Review 1960 09 vol 1 no 3; Publ...

5. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/our-stories/strange-lights-in-the-sky-the-westall-ufo-event-1966/

Source snippet

Strange lights in the sky: The Westall UFO event, 19666 Apr 2024 — This account was republished in its entirety in the June 1966 issue of...

Published: June 1966

6. Source: archive.org
Link:https://archive.org/stream/AustralianUFOFiles/0%20-%20foia%20australia%20national%20archives%20file%20numbers%20notes_djvu.txt

7. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: flying saucers fact or fiction
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/blog/flying-saucers-fact-or-fiction

8. Source: kirkmcd.princeton.edu
Title: jem tape achives basterfield
Link:https://kirkmcd.princeton.edu/JEMcDonald/jem_tape_achives_basterfield.pdf

9. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: fact sheets
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/help-your-research/fact-sheets

10. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: Tracing ancestors in the National Archives• Fact sheet
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-05/fs-201-tracing-ancestors-in-the-national-archives.pdf

11. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide chinese australian journeys 0
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-06/research-guide-chinese-australian-journeys_0.pdf

12. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: ufo sightings weapons testing site woomera
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/students-and-teachers/student-research-portal/learning-resource-themes/war/defence-equipment-and-weapons/ufo-sightings-weapons-testing-site-woomera

13. Source: naa.gov.au
Title: research guide safe haven
Link:https://www.naa.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-06/research-guide-safe-haven.pdf

14. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/terms/exhibition-catalogue/

15. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Title: collection development description
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/collection_development_description/

16. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/2013/page/17/

17. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Title: rare books cataloguing
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/terms/rare-books-cataloguing/

18. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Title: slv.vic.gov.au State Library Victoria
Link:https://www.blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/page/38/

19. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/terms/krizevci/

20. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/family-matters/page/4/

21. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Title: book history
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/terms/book-history/

22. Source: slv.vic.gov.au
Title: Library Board of Victoria
Link:https://www.slv.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/SLV_Annual_Report_2025_0.pdf

23. Source: blogs.slv.vic.gov.au
Link:https://blogs.slv.vic.gov.au/terms/ukraine/

24. Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/search/results/?_q=UFO

25. Source: media.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://media.nationalarchives.gov.uk/index.php/ufo-files-national-archives/

26. Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/the-ufo-files-extract.pdf

27. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Westall UFO
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westall_UFO

28. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Disappearance of Frederick Valentich
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disappearance_of_Frederick_Valentich

29. Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings

30. Source: catalogue.nla.gov.au
Title: nla.gov.au Victorian UFO Research Society
Link:https://catalogue.nla.gov.au/catalog?q=%22Victorian+UFO+Research+Society%22&search_field=author

31. Source: trove.nla.gov.au
Link:https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/236924150

32. Source: localhistory.kingston.vic.gov.au
Link:https://localhistory.kingston.vic.gov.au/articles/528

33. Source: archive.org
Title: Australian UFO Bulletin 1987 12 December djvu.txt
Link:https://archive.org/stream/Australian_UFO_Bulletin_1987_12_December/Australian_UFO_Bulletin_1987_12_December_djvu.txt

34. Source: archival.collections.slsa.sa.gov.au
Title: SRG410 UFOResearch Australia boxlist
Link:https://archival.collections.slsa.sa.gov.au/srg/SRG410_UFOResearchAustralia_boxlist.pdf

35. Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps

36. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: committee members of vfsrsvufors 1959
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2017/11/committee-members-of-vfsrsvufors-1959.html

Source snippet

Victorian Flying Saucer Research Society/ Victorian UFO Research Society.... Some individuals such as Peter Norris; Paul Norman and Judi...

37. Source: hauntedauckland.com
Title: Paranormal New Zealand UAS files located in the Australian Government record
Link:https://hauntedauckland.com/site/wp-content/uploads/UAS-files-located-in-the-Australian-Government-record-system2011.pdf

38. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer The Valentich Disappearance: Another UFO Cold Case
Link:https://skepticalinquirer.org/2013/11/the-valentich-disappearance-another-ufo-cold-case-solved/

39. Source: ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com
Title: the 1963 moe victoria sighting james e
Link:https://ufos-scientificresearch.blogspot.com/2016/09/the-1963-moe-victoria-sighting-james-e.html

40. Source: ufo.fandom.com
Link:https://ufo.fandom.com/wiki/Australia

Additional References

41. Source: afu.se
Title: AFU Magazines List 2017.xlsx
Link:https://www.afu.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/AFU-Magazines-List-2017.xlsx

Source snippet

Blad1Lindtner, M. 3, Evans, CEI. 945, Australia, Australian Flying Saucer Review, Victorian UFO Research Society (VUFORS), 1960, "Vol. 1...

42. Source: youtube.com
Title: Schoolyard witnesses in mass UFO sighting demand answers | Australian Story
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhKyQkhOfoM

Source snippet

Secrets of the UFOs | Full Documentary | 7NEWS Spotlight...

43. Source: youtube.com
Title: UFO Mystery Back In Spotlight As Witnesses Claim Cover Up | 10 News+
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhAcIsKJcCQ

Source snippet

Phenom Westall '66 - A Suburban UFO Mystery | HS Documentary...

44. Source: youtube.com
Title: Secrets of the UFOs | Full Documentary | 7NEWS Spotlight
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEczN_8Q380

Source snippet

UFO Mystery Back In Spotlight As Witnesses Claim Cover Up | 10 News+...

45. Source: youtube.com
Title: Phenom Westall ‘66
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjbTJIrMfsg

Source snippet

Archived: Australia's UFO Files | Official Trailer...

46. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/TheProjectTV/posts/52-years-on-and-the-reported-ufo-sighting-in-westall-continues-to-draw-community/10155716528468441/

47. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/groups/615137260546546/posts/1210763460983920/

48. Source: governmentattic.org
Link:https://www.governmentattic.org/13docs/UFOsRelatedSubjBiblio_Catoe_1969.pdf

49. Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/356789044/Australian-Flying-Saucer-Review-Number-1-March-1970

50. Source: en-academic.com
Link:https://en-academic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1831500

Source for page image:Investigations of flying saucers in Australia, A703, 554-1-30, part 1 · Wikimedia Commons · Public domain