Within Flying Ark

How Strong Is Parramatta's Flying Ark Evidence?

The case rests on Birmingham's later memorandum, with no known independent witness or contemporary report confirming a physical landing.

9 sources 3 graphics

On this page

  • What the surviving memorandum actually records
  • Why the five year delay matters
  • What evidence is missing or independent
Preview for How Strong Is Parramatta's Flying Ark Evidence?

Introduction

The evidence for Parramatta’s “flying ark” is historically interesting but ultimately weak as evidence for a physical unidentified flying object. The case rests almost entirely on Frederick William Birmingham’s own retrospective writings, not on contemporary eyewitness reports, official records, or independent corroboration. While Birmingham was a respected Parramatta engineer and surveyor, the surviving account describes what he himself characterised as a vision involving a spirit guide rather than an ordinary observation of an unexplained aircraft. Later discoveries of his handwritten notes have strengthened the authenticity of the documents themselves, but they have not strengthened the case for an actual airborne craft landing in Parramatta in 1868.[nsw.gov.au]historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.auParramatta History and HeritageFrederick William Birmingham | Parramatta History and HeritageJanuary 9, 2014…Published: January 9, 2014

Evidence illustration 1

What the surviving memorandum actually records

The central source is a memorandum book associated with 1873 that looks back to an experience Birmingham dated to the night of 25 July 1868. In it, he described seeing what he called an “ark” or “machine to go through the air”, entering the craft with a human-shaped spirit, and being shown papers containing figures and formulae that he believed related to flight. He wrote that the experience ended when he awoke, “deeply impressed with that vision of the night”, language that places the episode within a visionary or dream-like framework rather than a straightforward eyewitness report.[Project 1947]project1947.comProject 1947PROJECT 1947: Keith Basterfield - A CATALOGUE OF PRE 24 JUNE 1947 AUSTRALIAN UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA - Version 7…Published: JUNE 1947

Recent examination of original manuscript material held in the University of Sydney’s collections has confirmed that Birmingham genuinely wrote notes describing these experiences. The handwritten pages include references to the same spirit, later attempts to solve the problem of flight, subsequent visions, and sketches connected with an aerial machine. This archival work is important because it supports the authenticity of the surviving papers and reduces the likelihood that the account was simply invented by later UFO enthusiasts. However, authentic documents are not the same as proof that the events described occurred literally.[The Oz Files]theozfiles.blogspot.comOpen source on blogspot.com.

Instead, the manuscripts show remarkable consistency in Birmingham’s personal beliefs over many years. The same papers also contain accounts of prophetic messages, supernatural signs, unexplained voices, and political conspiracies, suggesting that the flying ark formed part of a much broader personal visionary worldview rather than a single isolated observation.[The Oz Files]theozfiles.blogspot.comOpen source on blogspot.com.

Why the five-year delay matters

One of the biggest limitations is chronology.

Birmingham dated the experience to 1868, yet the detailed surviving narrative is linked to a memorandum book from 1873. There is no known surviving diary entry from July 1868 describing an immediate encounter, no official report to authorities, and no newspaper account published at the time of the alleged landing.[Parramatta History and Heritage]historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.auParramatta History and HeritageFrederick William Birmingham | Parramatta History and HeritageJanuary 9, 2014…Published: January 9, 2014

This gap matters because memories often become reshaped by later experiences and interpretations. Between 1868 and the surviving memorandum, Birmingham appears to have become increasingly preoccupied with aeronautics, spiritual communications and attempts to understand the “machine to go through the air”. The later manuscripts repeatedly revisit the original vision, treating it as the source of continuing revelations rather than a single historical observation.[The Oz Files]theozfiles.blogspot.comOpen source on blogspot.com.

The delay does not prove that Birmingham fabricated the account. People frequently record genuine experiences years later. It does, however, reduce the evidential value of the narrative compared with a contemporaneous notebook, letter or official statement written immediately after the event.

30:04

What evidence is missing?

When historians or UFO researchers assess unusual cases, they normally look for independent lines of evidence that converge on the same event. In the Flying Ark case, almost all of those supporting lines are absent.

Missing evidence includes:

  • no confirmed independent eyewitness to an object landing in Parramatta Park;
  • no contemporary newspaper describing a mysterious aerial machine in July 1868;
  • no police, council or government record documenting an investigation;
  • no surviving physical artefacts connected directly with the alleged landing;
  • no observational evidence from other residents despite the supposed location being close to a settled town.[Project 1947]project1947.comProject 1947PROJECT 1947: Keith Basterfield - A CATALOGUE OF PRE 24 JUNE 1947 AUSTRALIAN UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA - Version 7…Published: JUNE 1947

The absence of corroboration is particularly important because Birmingham’s account describes an extraordinary event that, if physically witnessed by others, would likely have attracted public attention.

Evidence illustration 2

Does Birmingham’s professional reputation strengthen the case?

Birmingham’s background does add some weight to his credibility as a sincere witness. He was an engineer, surveyor, council officer and alderman rather than an anonymous storyteller. His technical interests also help explain why later writers found the account intriguing: he discussed structural features of an aerial machine decades before practical powered flight became reality.[Parramatta History and Heritage]historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.auParramatta History and HeritageFrederick William Birmingham | Parramatta History and HeritageJanuary 9, 2014…Published: January 9, 2014

However, professional status cannot compensate for missing evidence.

The manuscripts themselves show that Birmingham interpreted his experiences through a religious and spiritual framework. He consistently referred to spirits, visions, symbolic messages and divine guidance alongside engineering ideas. Rather than separating technical observation from supernatural experience, he combined them into a single personal belief system.[The Oz Files]theozfiles.blogspot.comOpen source on blogspot.com.

That context makes it difficult to reinterpret the Flying Ark simply as an early close encounter with an unidentified craft while ignoring the rest of Birmingham’s own explanation.

Has later research strengthened or weakened the claim?

Modern research has produced two different outcomes.

The first is positive for historical authenticity. Researchers have confirmed Birmingham’s identity, career and local standing, while archival discoveries have shown that handwritten material genuinely connected with him survives. This means the story is not merely a twentieth-century invention.[Parramatta History and Heritage]historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.auParramatta History and HeritageFrederick William Birmingham | Parramatta History and HeritageJanuary 9, 2014…Published: January 9, 2014

The second outcome is less supportive of the UFO interpretation. The newly examined manuscripts reveal even more references to visions, spirits, supernatural communications and continuing revelations than were widely known previously. Rather than uncovering hidden evidence for a physical landing, they reinforce the impression that Birmingham experienced and interpreted the Flying Ark within a broader visionary tradition.[The Oz Files]theozfiles.blogspot.comOpen source on blogspot.com.

As a result, recent archival work has generally strengthened confidence in the historical documents while weakening claims that they record an objective encounter with an unknown aircraft.

Evidence illustration 3

Overall assessment

Within New South Wales UFO history, Parramatta’s Flying Ark remains significant because it is an unusually early account involving an apparent flying machine and because it was written by a respected nineteenth-century engineer. It demonstrates that imaginative descriptions of advanced aerial craft appeared long before the modern UFO era.

As evidence for a physical unexplained object, however, the case remains limited. The surviving account is retrospective, framed as a vision, lacks independent witnesses, has no contemporary documentation of a landing, and is embedded within Birmingham’s wider pattern of spiritual experiences. For those reasons, most cautious historical assessments treat it as an important document in the cultural history of unusual aerial experiences rather than strong evidence that an unidentified craft actually landed in Parramatta in 1868.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Strong Is Parramatta's Flying Ark Evidence?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Endnotes

1. Source: historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.au
Link:https://historyandheritage.cityofparramatta.nsw.gov.au/blog/2014/01/09/frederick-william-birmingham

Source snippet

Parramatta History and HeritageFrederick William Birmingham | Parramatta History and HeritageJanuary 9, 2014...

Published: January 9, 2014

2. Source: theozfiles.blogspot.com
Link:https://theozfiles.blogspot.com/2024/08/the-birmingham-ufo-vision-manuscript.html?m=1

3. Source: project1947.com
Link:https://project1947.com/kbcat/kbpre47.htm

Source snippet

Project 1947PROJECT 1947: Keith Basterfield - A CATALOGUE OF PRE 24 JUNE 1947 AUSTRALIAN UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA - Version 7...

Published: JUNE 1947

4. Source: parramattaheritage.blogspot.com
Title: Parramatta Heritage: Frederick William Birmingham
Link:https://parramattaheritage.blogspot.com/2014/01/frederick-william-birmingham_9.html

Additional References

5. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vqsbptVgHU

Source snippet

Schoolyard witnesses in mass UFO sighting demand answers | Australian Story...

6. Source: youtube.com
Title: Secrets of the UFOs | Full Documentary | 7NEWS Spotlight
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEczN_8Q380

Source snippet

Australia's Biggest UFO Mystery | The Westall UFO Incident (1966)...

7. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqSHlmpBbIY

Source snippet

Secrets of the UFOs | Full Documentary | 7NEWS Spotlight...

8. Source: youtube.com
Title: Australia’s UFO Secrets Exposed with Ross Coulthart
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzoJPerhz-I

Source snippet

Oz Encounters: UFO's In Australia (1997) VHS Capture...

9. Source: youtube.com
Title: Schoolyard witnesses in mass UFO sighting demand answers | Australian Story
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhKyQkhOfoM